I've been reading about new developments in water electrolysis for hydrogen production, and I wonder how exactly this nickel–copper composite catalyst works. How does combining amorphous nickel sulfide with crystalline copper improve both hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions? Can the electron structure tuning really make such a big difference in reaction efficiency? And in practical terms, does this mean we could produce hydrogen at lower voltage and energy cost compared to traditional precious-metal catalysts? How close is this approach to being used in large-scale, green hydrogen production?
 Why Can a New Nickel–Copper Catalyst Make Hydrogen Production from Water Electrolysis More Efficient and Less Energy-Intensive?
Related Encyclopedia

- 1345-20-6
 - AsCuHO3
 - 187.47400
 - All (0)
 - China (0)
 - (0)
 

- 13587-24-1
 - CuHO4P
 - 159.52500
 - All (0)
 - China (0)
 - (0)
 

- 1333-74-0
 - H2
 - 2.02
 - All (5)
 - China (5)
 - (5)
 

- 1332-03-2
 - CuH2O5S
 - 177.62400
 - All (0)
 - China (0)
 - (0)
 
- 7268-93-1
 - C5H7CuO4
 - 194.65300
 - All (0)
 - China (0)
 - (0)
 
- 66771-03-7
 - Cu3
 - 190.63800
 - All (80)
 - China (13)
 - (80)
 
- 65357-62-2
 - Cu4
 - 254.18400
 - All (80)
 - China (13)
 - (80)
 
- 12190-70-4
 - Cu2
 - 127.09200
 - All (80)
 - China (13)
 - (80)
 

- 7440-50-8
 - Cu
 - 63.55
 - All (80)
 - China (13)
 - (80)
 

- 152203-32-2
 - C16H10CuO10
 - 425.79100
 - All (0)
 - China (0)
 - (0)
 
Related Products More >
-  
- 13927-71-4
 - CNY Request For Quotation
 
 -  
- CNY Request For Quotation
 
 -  
- CNY Request For Quotation
 
 -  
- CNY Request For Quotation
 
 -  
- 10402-15-2
 - CNY Request For Quotation
 
 -  
- 10402-15-1
 - CNY Request For Quotation
 
 -  
- 10402-15-0
 - CNY Request For Quotation
 
 -  
- 527-09-5
 - CNY Request For Quotation
 
 


  
  
Electron structure tuning is pivotal here: it modulates the charge distribution of active sites and the d-band center, directly optimizing the binding energy with reaction intermediates—a core factor determining catalytic efficiency, which traditional catalysts often fail to regulate precisely. Practically, the 1.49 V cell voltage at 10 mA/cm² is notably lower than that of precious-metal catalysts (e.g., Pt/C for HER + IrO₂ for OER, typically requiring ~1.6 V), drastically reducing energy consumption. This approach is close to large-scale green hydrogen production: it uses low-cost, earth-abundant non-precious metals (avoiding the scarcity/cost issues of Pt, Ir, Ru) and is compatible with anion exchange membrane electrolyzers (a mainstream device for green hydrogen). However, challenges like long-term stability under high current densities still need addressing for full industrial adoption.
The integration of amorphous nickel sulfide with crystalline copper in electrocatalytic materials represents a significant advancement in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production. This composite catalyst addresses intrinsic limitations of conventional non-precious metal catalysts through sophisticated electronic structure modulation. The amorphous nickel sulfide phase exhibits abundant unsaturated coordination sites and defective structures, while the crystalline copper framework provides electrical conductivity and structural stability. Their combination creates heterogeneous interfaces that induce charge redistribution, fundamentally altering reaction pathways for both hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER).
The enhanced catalytic performance originates from three synergistic mechanisms. Sulfur atoms in nickel sulfide accumulate positive charges that dramatically accelerate the initial electron transfer kinetics in HER, addressing the slow elementary step that plagues alkaline electrolysis. Copper sites with optimized d-band structure regulate the adsorption/desorption behavior of hydrogen intermediates (H), achieving neither too strong nor too weak bonding that would compromise thermodynamic efficiency. Most remarkably, the strong interfacial interaction between amorphous and crystalline phases triggers surface reconstruction during operation, weakening the adsorption strength of critical oxygen-containing intermediates (O, *OOH) in OER and thus facilitating the challenging four-proton-coupled electron transfer process.
Practically, this electronic structure engineering enables exceptional operational efficiency. The material demonstrates overall water splitting capability at just 1.49V cell voltage to achieve 10 mA/cm² current density in anion exchange membrane electrolyzers – approaching the performance of precious-metal catalysts (IrO₂, Pt/C) that require similar voltages but at dramatically reduced cost. This voltage reduction translates directly to lower energy consumption, potentially decreasing electricity usage by 15-20% compared to conventional non-precious catalysts.
For large-scale green hydrogen production, this technology demonstrates several advantageous characteristics: compatibility with industrial anion exchange membrane systems, reduced overpotential losses, and elimination of precious metal dependence. While durability testing under commercial operating conditions remains ongoing, the material's innovative amorphous-crystalline heterostructure provides atomic-level insights for designing cost-effective electrocatalysts. This development represents a crucial step toward economically viable green hydrogen, potentially accelerating the transition to renewable energy storage and decarbonizing industrial sectors that currently rely on fossil fuel-derived hydrogen.